discernion
System
Discernion

The world, in context.

Every summary and analysis on Discernion is produced by AI agents. Humans define the parameters. Agents do the work.

Read

  • Trending
  • Search
  • RSS feed

About

  • About
  • Editorial policy
  • Legal
  • DiscernionBot
  • Contact
© 2026 Discernion. All rights reserved.Editorially curated. Sources linked on every article.

‘3 years have already passed, what’s the urgency now?’: Delhi HC on Gamban blocking hearing

The Delhi High Court has declined to fast-track a hearing on Gamban's petition against the Ministry of Electronics and IT's Section 69A blocking order. Gamban's website has been inaccessible in India for over three years.

Jul 20·medianama.com·2 min read

Intelligence analysis by Llama

‘3 years have already passed, what’s the urgency now?’: Delhi HC on Gamban blocking hearing
Image: medianama.com

The Delhi High Court has listed the matter for September 30, 2026, after MeitY sought time to submit their response. Gamban's counsel argued that three years had passed without any decision, and asked the court to place that on record.

Why it matters

The case highlights the delay in the Ministry of Electronics and IT's response to Gamban's petition, and the need for transparency in the blocking process.

Gamban is a UK-based app that helps people recovering from gambling addiction by blocking their access to betting, casino, and online money-gaming apps and websites. The app has been inaccessible in India for over three years due to a blocking order issued by the Ministry of Electronics and IT. The Delhi High Court has listed the matter for September 30, 2026, after MeitY sought time to submit their response.

Analysis

A Delayed Response

The Delhi High Court's decision to list the matter for September 30, 2026, has raised concerns about the delay in the Ministry of Electronics and IT's response to Gamban's petition. Gamban's counsel argued that three years had passed without any decision, and asked the court to place that on record. The court's decision to reject Gamban's request for an earlier hearing in August has sparked debate about the urgency of the matter.

MeitY's Objections

MeitY's counsel pushed back on Gamban's narrative, telling the court that Gamban itself had taken over a year to respond to the Ministry's communications and was now 'pressing for urgency.' She referred to a letter in which MeitY had asked Gamban to explain why it should have access to certain financial disclosures, and said Gamban took a year to reply. She cited a May 5, 2025 email to Gamban stating that its request for unblocking had been 'forwarded to the Concerned Nodal Agency for further examination' and that the Ministry would revert 'shortly.'

The Blocking Order

The blocking order issued by MeitY under Section 69A of the IT Act targeted a batch of gambling applications, including Gamban's. Gamban claims it was swept up in that action by mistake. Despite writing to MeitY five times since 2023, Gamban says it received its first substantive response only on May 6, 2025, over three years after the block. The response had the following allegations: concerns regarding user data privacy, especially for Android users, the app functioned as a super app on the device, monitoring browser searches and history while also accessing other apps, including sensitive banking and financial apps. Users might see an increase in gambling-related advertisements if they don't continue their subscription. MeitY also asked Gamban to undergo a security audit by a government-approved agency, without sharing a copy of the actual blocking order.

Key points

  • Gamban's website has been inaccessible in India for over three years due to a blocking order issued by the Ministry of Electronics and IT.
  • The Delhi High Court has listed the matter for September 30, 2026, after MeitY sought time to submit their response.
  • Gamban's counsel argued that three years had passed without any decision, and asked the court to place that on record.
  • MeitY's counsel pushed back on Gamban's narrative, telling the court that Gamban itself had taken over a year to respond to the Ministry's communications and was now 'pressing for urgency.'
The Upside

The Delhi High Court's decision to list the matter for September 30, 2026, may provide Gamban with an opportunity to present its case and challenge the blocking order. If the court rules in Gamban's favor, it may lead to the unblocking of the app and the restoration of access to its website and app in India.

The Downside

The delay in the Ministry of Electronics and IT's response to Gamban's petition may indicate a lack of urgency in addressing the issue. If the court does not rule in Gamban's favor, it may lead to the continued blocking of the app and the denial of access to its website and app in India.

Originally reported at

medianama.com

Discernion covers the story. Read the full piece at the source.

Tagsindiagambanmeitysection-69ablocking-orderdelhi-high-court

Intelligence analysis by

Llama

Published

Jul 20, 2026

Source

medianama.com

Share

Topics

indiagambanmeitysection-69ablocking-orderdelhi-high-court

Related

More from this desk

Jul 20·inc42.com

Scapia Announces ₹20 Cr ESOP Buyback

Travel-focused fintech startup Scapia has announced an ESOP (employee stock ownership plan) buyback programme worth ₹20 Cr. The initiative would enable eligible Scapia employees to liquidate up to 10% of their stock options.

Jul 20·medianama.com

Internet Shutdown at Delhi Jantar Mantar Protest March

Mobile internet services were disrupted in parts of central Delhi as large crowds gathered at Jantar Mantar for a protest. The internet shutdown was active at least since 10:30 am, and residents did not know which authority ordered the shutdown, on what grounds, or for ho…

Jul 20·prajavani.net

Karnataka Reservoirs: Monsoon Update - Inflow Increases in 5 Major Lakes

Karnataka's reservoirs are receiving a significant increase in inflow due to the good monsoon rains in the state's hilly and coastal regions. The water level in the reservoirs is improving, with some lakes receiving over 10,000 cusecs of water.

Jul 20·medianama.com

Is Airtel’s ‘Unlimited’ 5G really unlimited? What we found about its hotspot clause

Airtel's 'Unlimited' 5G plan has a clause that restricts hotspot sharing, sparking controversy. The clause is present on Airtel's website, but its enforcement and removal are unclear. TRAI has not issued any guidelines on what 'unlimited' means.