Alternative Import Routes; The New Role of Kolbars and Lenj-Owners in Iran's Economy
Iran is legalizing and expanding informal border trade methods, kolbari (porterage) and tah-lenji (trade by traditional boats), to circumvent international sanctions and secure essential imports, transforming these activities into official supply channels.
Intelligence analysis by Gemini 2.5 Flash

Facing severe international sanctions and disruptions in conventional trade routes, the Iranian government is formalizing previously informal border trade practices like kolbari and tah-lenji. This strategic shift aims to ensure the supply of consumer goods, foodstuffs, and industrial raw materials, effectively integrating these high-risk livelihoods into the country's official import…
Imagine Iran needs to buy lots of things from other countries, but it's really hard because of special rules and problems with big ships. So, the government is now letting people who used to carry goods on their backs (called kolbars) or in small wooden boats (called lenj-owners) do it officially. It's like turning a secret shortcut into a main road for getting important stuff like food and parts for factories. But this change might make it harder for the regular kolbars to earn money, as bigger companies are now getting involved.
Analysis
The Iranian government's decision to formalize and expand kolbari and tah-lenji represents a significant pivot in its economic strategy, driven primarily by the need to circumvent international sanctions and maintain a steady flow of imports. Historically, these activities were dangerous, informal means of livelihood for border residents in western and southern Iran, often associated with smuggling. However, the article highlights a transformation, particularly evident in the year 1405 (2026-2027), where these methods are being integrated into the official import network.
1405
This year marks a critical juncture where the role of kolbars and lenj-owners is undergoing a profound transformation. The government, instead of suppressing these activities, has chosen to legalize and expand them, turning them into vital conduits for national imports. This shift is a direct response to the difficulties Iran faces in accessing conventional trade routes and the international banking system, which have been severely hampered by sanctions.
The formalization process began with the approval of the "Law on Organizing and Supervising Border Trade (Kolbari and Seafaring) and Creating Sustainable Employment for Border Residents" in February 1402 (2024). This legislation, along with its executive regulations, authorized imports via these channels for five years, ostensibly to reduce informal exchanges and support border livelihoods. However, the expanding list of authorized goods, now including industrial components and raw materials, clearly indicates a broader strategic objective: to use these routes to meet the country's diverse import needs, from consumer goods to critical industrial supplies.
Ministry of Industry, Mine, and Trade
A clear indicator of this policy's strategic importance is the direct involvement of the Ministry of Industry, Mine, and Trade. On May 20, 1405 (2026), the ministry's Director-General of the Office of Export and Import Regulations officially authorized the import of raw materials for petrochemical and polymer industries through kolbari and seafaring procedures. This directive, issued amidst heightened restrictions on maritime trade, underscores the government's reliance on these unconventional channels for strategic industrial inputs.
Reports from Tasnim News Agency and Fars News Agency further corroborate this, detailing a "Mission to Kolbars for the Petrochemical Industry" and the Ministry's insistence on using these routes for home appliance industry components. While implementation challenges remain, the intent is clear: to leverage these border trade mechanisms as a robust alternative supply chain. The expansion of authorized goods in July 1405 (2026) to include items like batteries, computer parts, and machinery, far beyond typical household needs, further solidifies the industrial and production utility of these routes.
300,000
The estimated number of active kolbars, around 300,000 according to a 1396 (2017-2018) judicial official's statement, highlights the significant human element involved in this evolving trade. While the government's stated goal is to support border residents, critics argue that the formalization process is fundamentally altering the nature of kolbari, potentially marginalizing traditional porters. The new laws allow companies, cooperatives, and business cardholders to operate in this domain, shifting trade away from individual kolbars towards more formal, larger economic players.
This shift, according to critics, could limit job opportunities for traditional kolbars and intensify economic pressure on border communities, despite the overall increase in goods flow. The example of 700 tons of "American" rice imported via kolbari cardholders, bypassing traditional methods and even customs registration, illustrates how the system is being adapted by larger entities. This transformation, while addressing national import challenges, raises significant questions about equity and the long-term socio-economic impact on the very communities it purports to support.
Key points
- Iran is legalizing and expanding informal border trade methods, kolbari and tah-lenji, to bypass international sanctions.
- This policy aims to secure imports of consumer goods, foodstuffs, and industrial raw materials, integrating these activities into the official supply chain.
- The "Law on Organizing and Supervising Border Trade" (Feb 1402/2024) authorized these imports for five years.
- The Ministry of Industry, Mine, and Trade has specifically directed the use of these routes for petrochemical and polymer industry raw materials.
- Critics argue that this shift benefits larger economic players and companies, potentially marginalizing traditional kolbars and increasing economic pressure on border communities.
The formalization of kolbari and tah-lenji could ensure a more stable supply of essential goods and raw materials for Iran's industries, mitigating the impact of sanctions and potentially stabilizing domestic markets. This policy might also provide a legal framework for border residents, reducing the risks associated with informal trade and offering a degree of official recognition.
The formalization of kolbari and tah-lenji could displace traditional, small-scale traders, concentrating profits among larger economic players and companies. This might exacerbate economic hardship for many border residents who relied on these activities for their livelihood, leading to increased inequality and social challenges.



