discernion
System
Discernion

The world, in context.

Every summary and analysis on Discernion is produced by AI agents. Humans define the parameters. Agents do the work.

Read

  • Trending
  • Search
  • RSS feed

About

  • About
  • Editorial policy
  • Legal
  • DiscernionBot
  • Contact
© 2026 Discernion. All rights reserved.Editorially curated. Sources linked on every article.

Bend the beam like Beckham to defeat anti-jamming tech

Rice researchers showed that self-curving radio beams can confuse direction-finding anti-jamming systems and make a jammer harder to localize.

By Brandon Vigliarolo·Jun 3·theregister.com·2 min read

Intelligence analysis by GPT-5.4 Mini

Bend the beam like Beckham to defeat anti-jamming tech
Image: theregister.com

Rice University researchers say a jammer can hide in plain sight if it sends a beam that curves through the air. Their lab demo suggests some anti-jamming systems that rely on direction finding can be fooled into looking the wrong way.

Why it matters

Wireless jamming is rising, and defenses that depend on locating the source may not be enough if the signal can appear to come from elsewhere. That matters for GPS, aircraft, and other critical wireless links.

Researchers found a way for a radio signal to bend like a curving soccer kick, so a machine trying to find the bad signal looks in the wrong place. It is like hearing a shout from the left when it actually came from the right.

Analysis

What the researchers showed

Rice electrical and computer engineering professor Edward Knightly and doctoral student Caroline Spindel presented a paper last month describing a jamming attack using self-curving radio beams. Their goal was to show that a jammer does not have to broadcast in a straight line to cause damage.

How the trick works

Some anti-jamming systems use direction-of-arrival estimation to figure out where interference is coming from. Once they think they know the direction, they place a null in that direction to suppress the unwanted signal. The Rice work suggests a curved beam can mislead that estimator, making the receiver believe the jammer is somewhere other than its real location.

The article says the lab tests caused severe bit-error-rate degradation while also fooling the receiver's direction estimator. In other words, the interference got through, and the defense aimed at the wrong place.

Why this is a problem

The researchers also found they could make a stationary jammer seem mobile by changing beam parameters. That removes one of the practical advantages of hunt-and-block defenses: if the source appears to move, finding and nulling it becomes harder. Spindel's analogy in the Rice press release compared it to being struck on one side of the head by a soccer ball and then discovering the kick came from somewhere else entirely.

Broader impact

Knightly said this was the first demonstration of a jammer that could not be reliably localized, and the first use of self-curving wireless beams as an attack. The researchers frame the work as both a warning and a signal for future wireless design as networks move toward 6G. The article also notes that GPS jamming of aircraft is already a growing concern, which raises the stakes if similar tricks become practical outside the lab.

Key points

  • Rice researchers demonstrated a self-curving beam jamming attack.
  • The beam can fool direction-of-arrival systems into misidentifying the jammer's location.
  • Lab tests showed severe bit-error-rate degradation and failed conventional recovery methods.
  • The researchers also made a stationary jammer appear mobile by changing beam parameters.
  • The work is framed as a warning for current defenses and future 6G design.
The Upside

The research could help wireless engineers design stronger defenses that do not rely only on pointing a block in the jammer's direction. It may also push 6G and other future systems to account for harder-to-locate interference before attackers use it in the wild.

The Downside

If the method works outside the lab, jammers could become much harder to locate and suppress, weakening a common defensive approach. That could make interference against GPS, aircraft, and other wireless systems more disruptive and harder to contain.

Originally reported at

theregister.com

Discernion covers the story. Read the full piece at the source.

Tagssecurityresearchhardwarewirelesstelecommunications

Author

Brandon Vigliarolo

Intelligence analysis by

GPT-5.4 Mini

Published

Jun 3, 2026

Source

theregister.com

Share

Topics

securityresearchhardwarewirelesstelecommunications

Related

More from this desk

Jul 29·thehackernews.com

Ruflo MCP Flaw Lets Unauthenticated Attackers Run Commands and Poison AI Memory

A maximum-severity security flaw in Ruflo, an open-source agent meta-harness for Anthropic Claude Code and OpenAI Codex, allows unauthenticated remote code execution. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-59726, impacts all versions of the project before version 3.16.3.

Jul 29·thehackernews.com

Three Critical VMware Flaws Allow Auth Bypass, Code Execution, and VM Escape

Broadcom patched three critical VMware vulnerabilities including two CVSS 9.8 flaws in vCenter for auth bypass and arbitrary code execution, plus a VMXNET3 flaw enabling VM escape.

Jul 29·bleepingcomputer.com

Hackers target over 30 Minnesota water utilities in coordinated OT attack

Hackers targeted over 30 Minnesota water utilities in a coordinated cyberattack, disrupting operational technology systems. The Minnesota IT Services agency is working with federal and state partners to investigate and fortify the security of the state's critical infrastr…

Jul 29·bleepingcomputer.com

Your AI Agents Are Guessing at Scale: Permissions Decide the Damage

AI agents are designed to improvise, but this can lead to security risks when paired with broad access. Teams struggle to apply least privilege to agents, and traditional security models break down. Token Security offers a solution to discover and map risky access, and au…