Navigation, jurisdiction, costs: Iran, Oman attempt to hammer out Hormuz deal

{"

Sovereignty and Jurisdiction in the Strait of Hormuz":"The negotiations between Iran and Oman are centered around defining the terms of a controlled resumption of shipping in the strait. Both countries emphasize the importance of sovereignty and jurisdiction, highlighting the need for a framework that complies with international law. The involvement of Iran's Revolutionary Guards and the proposed arrangement for sharing revenues from any fees imposed in the strait are key points of contention.","

Challenges and Hurdles":"The negotiations are held up by Iran's insistence on US concessions, particularly the lifting of sanctions and compensation for war damage. Oman, on the other hand, seeks to separate freedom of navigation from the wider conflict. The US's stance complicates the situation, as it views the strait as under its control and has threatened Oman with bombing if it stands in the way of US passage.","

Regional Dynamics":"The negotiations are also influenced by regional dynamics. Oman is seeking to maintain its role as an intermediary between Iran and the US, avoiding giving the impression of full support for Iranian control over the strait. This strategy aims to achieve a regional understanding that guarantees freedom of navigation collectively, rather than relying on a permanent US military presence or Iran's ability to control the strait on its own."}