Publish political donation limits for 2027 elections, SERAP tells INEC
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged Nigeria's Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to publish political contribution limits and disclose monitoring systems for the upcoming 2027 general elections.
Intelligence analysis by Gemini 2.5 Flash

SERAP's call comes as INEC has already released the election timetable, making timely disclosure crucial. The organization emphasizes that greater transparency in political financing, including cash, in-kind, and digital contributions, is vital for voters to make informed choices and for democratic integrity, given past challenges with opaque funding and weak enforcement.
Imagine a big race where everyone needs money to buy their running shoes and snacks. A group called SERAP is asking the referee, INEC, to tell everyone how much money each runner is allowed to get from their friends, and how the referee will check to make sure no one cheats by getting too much. This helps make sure the race is fair for everyone, not just the richest runners.
Analysis
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has intensified its advocacy for greater transparency in Nigeria's electoral financing, specifically targeting the 2027 general elections. The organization's demand to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) highlights a persistent challenge in Nigerian politics: the opaque nature of political contributions and campaign expenditures. With the election timetable already released, SERAP argues that immediate action is necessary to ensure a level playing field and prevent the distortion of electoral competition by illicit or excessive funding.
SERAP's Demand
SERAP's request, conveyed through its Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare to INEC Chairman Professor Joash Amupitan, is multifaceted. It urges INEC to disclose whether it has exercised its statutory power under Section 91 of the Electoral Act, 2026, to prescribe limits on political contributions. If such limits exist, SERAP demands their immediate publication and wide communication to all stakeholders, including political parties, candidates, donors, and the general public. Furthermore, the organization seeks details on the systems, personnel, and procedures INEC has established to monitor, investigate, and enforce compliance with these limits, particularly concerning cash, in-kind, digital, and social-media financing, as well as third-party expenditures and donations through intermediaries.
SERAP also requested the latest detailed statements from political parties regarding their assets, liabilities, sources of funds, and expenditures submitted to INEC. The organization specifically asked for the publication of parties' financial records, including annual statements, audited accounts, and election expenditure returns for 2023–2025. This also extends to INEC's examination and audit reports under Sections 225 and 226, and annual reports submitted to the National Assembly within the same period. These disclosures, SERAP contends, are vital for citizens to identify potential financial improprieties before they can influence election outcomes.
Electoral Act, 2026
The legal basis for SERAP's demand is firmly rooted in the Electoral Act, 2026. Section 91(1) of the Act explicitly grants INEC the power to place limitations on the amount of money or other assets an individual can contribute to a political party or candidate. It also empowers the commission to demand information on the amount and source of such funds. Crucially, Section 91(2) provides for sanctions against individuals, candidates, or political parties that exceed these prescribed limits. SERAP emphasizes that this statutory power is a critical safeguard against undue financial influence over political processes, designed to protect the integrity of democratic elections. The organization's push is for INEC to not only acknowledge this power but to actively implement and enforce it transparently.
Nigeria's Elections
The context of Nigeria's elections reveals a persistent problem of political parties failing to disclose campaign contributions, a non-compliance described as systemic. The article highlights that the absence of clear and effective sanctions for default has historically weakened INEC's enforcement capabilities. Nigeria has long grappled with significant challenges in regulating political finance, including concerns about excessive campaign spending, opaque funding sources, weak disclosure and reporting mechanisms, and limited enforcement of statutory spending and contribution rules. The increasing monetisation of elections, coupled with the potential misuse of state institutions, poses serious threats to democratic integrity and electoral competition. SERAP's intervention aims to address these systemic issues by advocating for proactive transparency and robust enforcement, thereby fostering a more equitable and credible electoral environment for the 2027 polls.
Key points
- SERAP has urged INEC to publish political contribution limits for the 2027 general elections.
- The demand includes disclosing systems and procedures for monitoring and enforcing compliance with financing limits.
- SERAP highlights that INEC has statutory power under Section 91 of the Electoral Act, 2026, to set and enforce these limits.
- The organization also requested the publication of political parties' financial statements and INEC's audit reports for 2023-2025.
- The move aims to combat the increasing monetisation of Nigeria's elections and ensure democratic integrity.
If INEC complies with SERAP's demands, publishing clear donation limits and robust monitoring plans, it could significantly enhance the transparency and fairness of the 2027 elections. This proactive approach might deter illicit financing, reduce the influence of money in politics, and foster greater public trust in Nigeria's democratic institutions.
Should INEC fail to publish and enforce political donation limits effectively, the 2027 elections risk being marred by continued opaque funding and excessive spending. This could perpetuate an uneven playing field, allowing wealthy individuals or groups to unduly influence electoral outcomes and further erode public confidence in the democratic process.
