Japan FSA asks crypto exchanges to impose withdrawal delays to fight scams
Japan's financial regulator is urging crypto exchanges to implement withdrawal delays and other security measures to combat increasing fraud and scams involving digital assets.
Intelligence analysis by Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

The Financial Services Agency (FSA) and National Police Agency have requested crypto exchanges to introduce safeguards like withdrawal delays, pre-registration of withdrawal addresses, and customer-specific limits to prevent the misuse of accounts for illicit activities.
Imagine your piggy bank has a special lock. The government wants crypto companies to add a small delay before you can take money out after putting it in, like waiting a day. They also want you to tell them ahead of time where you want to send your money, and then wait a bit before you can actually send it. This helps stop bad guys from quickly taking money that doesn't belong to them.
Analysis
Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association
The Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA), in conjunction with the National Police Agency, has put forth a series of recommendations to the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA). This self-regulatory body for crypto exchanges is tasked with evaluating and potentially implementing these new safeguards. The core of the proposal centers on disrupting the immediate movement of funds, a common tactic used by scammers to launder or abscond with stolen assets. By introducing friction into the withdrawal process, authorities hope to create a window for intervention and recovery.
Withdrawal Delays and Address Registration
A key recommendation involves imposing a mandatory delay on cryptocurrency withdrawals following a fiat deposit or the purchase of digital assets. This measure is designed to give exchanges and potentially law enforcement a critical period to scrutinize transactions and identify suspicious activity before funds can be moved off-platform. Furthermore, exchanges are being asked to require users to pre-register their crypto withdrawal addresses. This adds another layer of security, as any newly added address would then be subject to a waiting period before it can be utilized for withdrawals, further complicating the efforts of fraudsters who often rely on rapid, untraceable transfers.
Enhanced Authentication and Monitoring
Beyond withdrawal controls, the FSA and NPA are advocating for a broader suite of security enhancements. These include the implementation of customer-specific withdrawal limits, which can help contain the damage from a compromised account. Stronger monitoring of both transaction patterns and access environments is also crucial, aiming to detect anomalies that might indicate unauthorized access or fraudulent activity. The push for phishing-resistant multifactor authentication is a direct response to common attack vectors, while checks to ensure bank remitter names match crypto account holders aim to prevent the use of mule accounts for money laundering. These measures, while not legally binding, represent a significant regulatory push towards a more secure digital asset ecosystem in Japan.
Key points
- Japan's FSA and National Police Agency are requesting crypto exchanges implement new safeguards against fraud.
- Key proposals include withdrawal delays after fiat deposits or asset purchases and pre-registration of withdrawal addresses.
- Additional measures suggested are customer-specific withdrawal limits and enhanced authentication methods.
- These recommendations are aimed at curbing sophisticated scams and preventing the misuse of exchange accounts for illicit funds.
- The measures are not binding rules, and exchanges will determine implementation based on their operations.
If these measures are effectively implemented, they could significantly reduce the success rate of crypto-related scams and fraud in Japan, leading to greater user confidence and a more secure trading environment. This could foster broader adoption of digital assets by mitigating perceived risks associated with fund security.
The proposed delays and registration requirements might inconvenience legitimate users, potentially leading to frustration and a less seamless trading experience. Exchanges may also face increased operational costs in implementing and managing these new security protocols.



