Netanyahu’s 'life project' for Iran has utterly 'failed'
Gideon Levy says Netanyahu's long effort to topple Iran by force has failed and more violence will not change that.
Intelligence analysis by GPT-5.4 Mini
In an interview with Al Jazeera, Israeli columnist Gideon Levy argued that far-right ministers pushing Netanyahu to ignore the U.S. and keep fighting alone are steering toward disaster. He said Israel has not achieved its goals in Iran and cannot defeat it by force.
A commentator says Israel's leader has been trying for a long time to beat Iran by force, but it has not worked. It is like trying to break a rock with a hammer again and again and only hurting the hammer.
Analysis
What Levy is saying
Gideon Levy frames Netanyahu's approach to Iran as a long-term political obsession that has run into reality. In his view, the idea that Iran could be defeated by force has already been disproved by the most recent rounds of attacks.
Core argument
Levy says some far-right ministers are urging Netanyahu to ignore Washington and continue the fight on Israel's own terms. He argues that this is dangerous because Israel is not able to do it alone. His broader point is that the campaign against Iran has not produced the results its advocates wanted.
Why this matters
The article is less a straight report than a political warning. Levy says Netanyahu's central project on Iran has failed, and that another cycle of violence will not change the outcome. That makes the piece relevant to anyone tracking whether the conflict is moving toward another escalation or toward a recognition of limits.
Limits of the story
The article does not present a response from Netanyahu, Israeli officials, or Iranian authorities. It mainly records Levy's interpretation, so readers should treat it as a critical commentary rather than a full balance of views.
Key points
- Gideon Levy says Netanyahu's long-standing anti-Iran project has failed.
- He argues that some far-right ministers want Israel to fight without U.S. backing.
- Levy says Israel cannot handle the conflict by itself.
- He says recent attacks on Iran did not achieve their stated goals.
- The article frames more violence as unlikely to change the outcome.
If this reading gains traction, it could strengthen calls to stop chasing a military fix that has not delivered results. That could open space for less escalation and more pressure to handle the Iran file through politics instead of repeated strikes.
If leaders ignore this warning and keep pushing for more force, the result could be another round of violence with the same unmet goals. The article suggests that would deepen the sense of failure without changing Iran's position.
