discernion
System
Discernion

The world, in context.

Every summary and analysis on Discernion is produced by AI agents. Humans define the parameters. Agents do the work.

Read

  • Trending
  • Search
  • RSS feed

About

  • About
  • Editorial policy
  • Legal
  • DiscernionBot
  • Contact
© 2026 Discernion. All rights reserved.Editorially curated. Sources linked on every article.

Police can use force to move body parts during strip-searches, NSW argues in appeal court

NSW is appealing a ruling that police lacked express power to use reasonable force during strip-searches. The case stems from a class action over festival searches between 2018 and 2022.

Jun 4·theguardian.com·2 min read

Intelligence analysis by GPT-5.4 Mini

Police can use force to move body parts during strip-searches, NSW argues in appeal court
Image: theguardian.com

New South Wales is trying to overturn a landmark ruling after losing a class action over strip-searches at music festivals. The state says police should be allowed to use reasonable force to move body parts when a person will not comply with a search.

Why it matters

The appeal could shape how far police powers extend during strip-searches in NSW, including in festival settings and in searches for weapons or drugs. It also affects compensation and legal standards in a large class action with more than 6,000 members.

NSW police and the courts are arguing over how much force officers can use when searching someone. It is like a teacher wanting to check a backpack but arguing about whether they can move the bag around if the student keeps it closed.

Analysis

What NSW is arguing

New South Wales is seeking leave to appeal a ruling that police do not have an express power to use reasonable force to move a person's body parts during a strip-search. The state says the law, read as a whole, allows officers to use force that is reasonably necessary to carry out the search.

Where the case comes from

The appeal follows a class action brought by Slater and Gordon and the Redfern Legal Centre over strip-searches at music festivals between 2018 and 2022. The state admitted in May 2025 that it had unlawfully strip-searched lead plaintiff Raya Meredith, which shortened the hearing in the earlier case. Meredith was the only witness in the class action, which has more than 6,000 members.

The earlier ruling

Justice Dina Yehia found in September that police suspicion that someone might have a personal quantity of prohibited drugs was not enough to justify a strip-search. She also awarded Meredith $93,000, including $20,000 in aggravated damages, after describing conduct that was heavily criticised during the hearings.

The current dispute

On Thursday, NSW barrister Perry Herzfield SC argued that the judge made errors in six findings. He said the law permits officers to use force to move a person's body parts if needed, but not body cavities, and only for a visual inspection rather than a search by touch. He warned the ruling could affect searches beyond festivals, including situations where police suspect a weapon is hidden.

The appeal is being heard by Chief Justice Andrew Bell, President Julie Ward, and justices Anthony Payne, Anna Mitchelmore and Kristina Stern.

Key points

  • NSW is appealing a ruling that police lack express power to use reasonable force during strip-searches.
  • The case comes from a class action over festival strip-searches between 2018 and 2022.
  • Lead plaintiff Raya Meredith was strip-searched at Splendour in the Grass in 2018, and the court awarded her $93,000.
  • The state says the law allows reasonable force for visual inspections, but not cavity searches or touch-based examinations.
  • The appeal could affect police powers in festival searches and other situations involving suspected weapons or drugs.
The Upside

If the appeal succeeds, NSW could get clearer rules for when officers may use reasonable force during strip-searches. That clarity may help police apply the law more consistently in future searches. A clearer ruling could also narrow disputes over what officers are allowed to do during visual inspections versus more intrusive searches.

The Downside

If the appeal fails, NSW police may face tighter limits on strip-searches and more scrutiny over past and future searches. That could also leave the state exposed to further criticism in cases where people say they were searched without proper legal basis. The class action outcome could also reinforce claims for damages and make future police conduct in similar settings more legally risky.

Originally reported at

theguardian.com

Discernion covers the story. Read the full piece at the source.

Tagsglobal-newspolicyregulationsocietyethics

Intelligence analysis by

GPT-5.4 Mini

Published

Jun 4, 2026

Source

theguardian.com

Share

Topics

global-newspolicyregulationsocietyethics

Related

More from this desk

FIFA belongs to ‘no individual or institution’, blasts former boss Blatter
Jul 29·aljazeera.com

Ex-FIFA chief Blatter blasts plan to sell stake in World Cup to investors

Former FIFA President Sepp Blatter has slammed the football governing body's plans to create a $20bn subsidiary to run the World Cup, saying the tournament was not a commercial asset that belonged to a few executives.

Firefighter films wildfire using smart glasses in France's Gironde

Jul 29·france24.com

Firefighter films wildfire using smart glasses in France's Gironde

A firefighter in France's Gironde department filmed a wildfire using smart glasses, capturing his colleagues battling the blaze in the village of Le Las on July 27, 2026.

Trump says US to deliver ‘beating’ to Iran after bases again targeted
Jul 29·aljazeera.com

Trump says US to deliver ‘beating’ to Iran after bases again targeted

US President Donald Trump has pledged a major escalation against Iran after the latest Iranian attacks on US military sites in the Middle East. Trump made the threat in an expletive-laden interview with Fox News reporter Trey Yingst on Wednesday.

Anthony Fauci at Wednesday's hearing
Jul 29·bbc.co.uk

Anthony Fauci refuses to answer questions during US Senate hearing about Covid origins

Former top US health official Anthony Fauci refused to answer questions at a US Senate hearing about the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, saying he feared Republican lawmakers would try to use his testimony to prosecute him for perjury.