Rubio’s bypass plan: Can the world escape the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint?
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's remarks about the Strait of Hormuz have sparked a debate over the future of global energy transit. Economic experts and geopolitical analysts warn that redrawing the Middle East's energy map is fraught with logistical and security hurdles.
Intelligence analysis by Llama

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's plan to bypass the Strait of Hormuz is a long-term strategic vision rather than an immediately executable economic plan. The plan faces significant logistical and security challenges, including the need for billions of dollars in investments and the risk of targeting by Iran.
Imagine you're trying to get a big package from one country to another. The Strait of Hormuz is like a super busy highway that lots of big trucks use to get from one place to another. But now, some people want to build a new road that goes over land instead of using the highway. This new road would be like a big detour that would take a long time and be hard to build. It's like trying to find a new way to get the package from one country to another, but it's not as easy as it sounds.
Analysis
A $60B Vote of Confidence
Rubio's plan to bypass the Strait of Hormuz is a long-term strategic vision rather than an immediately executable economic plan. The plan faces significant logistical and security challenges, including the need for billions of dollars in investments and the risk of targeting by Iran. According to data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), the narrow 39-kilometre (24-mile) strait handles roughly 20 million barrels of oil per day, equating to about 20 percent of global petroleum liquids consumption. Furthermore, the EIA noted that the strait serves as the transit point for a fifth of the world's liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade, primarily from Qatar. Economic researcher Ahmed Abu Qamar told Al Jazeera that Rubio's statements represent a long-term strategic vision rather than an immediately executable economic plan. Energy markets are governed by the hard realities of supply and demand, he added, and it would take decades and billions of dollars in investments to even partially reduce reliance on the strait as one of the world's main thoroughfares for commodities.
The Pipeline Illusion
To execute this monumental shift, energy producers in the Middle East have previously mooted the idea of building vast overland pipelines to bypass the Strait of Hormuz. The crown jewel of this strategy is Saudi Arabia's East-West Pipeline, also known as Petroline, which links the Abqaiq oil processing facilities to the port of Yanbu on the Red Sea. Following recent repairs after wartime attacks, the Saudi Ministry of Energy confirmed the pipeline is back to pumping approximately seven million barrels per day. Additionally, the United Arab Emirates operates the Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline, which transports up to 1.8 million barrels per day directly to the port of Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, again outside the Strait of Hormuz. Still, completely replacing the Strait of Hormuz as a major corridor for energy resources from producer to consumer is mathematically impossible in the near term. An Al Jazeera explainer reported that existing alternative pipelines have a combined maximum capacity of only about nine million barrels per day, falling drastically short of the 20 million barrels that typically transit the strait. The EIA estimated that as a result of any sudden disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, there would be just around 2.6 million barrels per day of unused capacity from Saudi and Emirati pipelines. Abu Qamar further questioned the viability of this route for other major producers, asking how Kuwait, Qatar, and Iraq would export their massive energy outputs without the strait. Shifting reliance from Hormuz to the Red Sea also transfers the geopolitical vulnerability to other regional chokepoints. Saudi Arabia's successful East-West bypass relies on the Bab al-Mandeb Strait remaining open for ships travelling south to crucial Asian markets, such as China, Japan, and India. The rerouting of oil to Yanbu simply forces Asian-bound tankers to navigate the Bab al-Mandeb, which is actively threatened by Houthi forces in Yemen.
Static Targets and Investment Fears
Bypassing maritime routes through overland infrastructure carries its own severe security risks. In an Al Jazeera report, independent energy analyst George Voloshin highlighted that pipelines and pumping stations are static, high-value targets. These facilities remain highly susceptible to drone and missile attacks, as seen in past disruptions. Moving away from the sea simply transfers the risk to land. Abu Qamar pointed out that Iran is fully capable of targeting these overland pipelines and disrupting tanker traffic thousands of kilometres away. Because these massive infrastructure projects lack adequate protection against modern drone warfare, major global energy companies are deeply hesitant to invest billions of dollars into potentially highly vulnerable assets. Ultimately, while partial diversification is under way, escaping the geographic reality of the Strait of Hormuz remains an elusive goal for the global energy market.
Key points
- US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's plan to bypass the Strait of Hormuz is a long-term strategic vision rather than an immediately executable economic plan.
- The plan faces significant logistical and security challenges, including the need for billions of dollars in investments and the risk of targeting by Iran.
- Existing alternative pipelines have a combined maximum capacity of only about nine million barrels per day, falling drastically short of the 20 million barrels that typically transit the strait.
- Shifting reliance from Hormuz to the Red Sea also transfers the geopolitical vulnerability to other regional chokepoints.
- Bypassing maritime routes through overland infrastructure carries its own severe security risks, including the risk of drone and missile attacks.
If Rubio's plan is successful, it could lead to a more stable and secure global energy market. This could result in lower energy prices and reduced inflation. Additionally, a more diversified energy market could reduce the risk of supply disruptions and make it easier for countries to access energy resources.
However, the plan also faces significant challenges, including the need for billions of dollars in investments and the risk of targeting by Iran. If the plan is not successful, it could lead to increased tensions in the region and a more unstable global energy market. This could result in higher energy prices, increased inflation, and reduced access to energy resources.


