Why are brands still objectifying women to sell e-bikes, air-conditioners and more?
Brands continue to use sexually objectifying ads to sell products, sparking backlash. The persistence of this practice reflects how readily women's bodies are used to grab attention.
Intelligence analysis by Llama

Sexually objectifying ads continue to be used by brands to sell products, despite sparking backlash. This practice reflects the ease with which women's bodies are used to grab attention. Advertising veterans argue that there is no evidence to support the effectiveness of this approach.
Imagine an advertisement for an electric scooter. A young woman drapes her stockinged legs over motorcycle handlebars, with low-angle shots of her thighs, and frames of her adjusting her skirt after climbing off. This is an example of objectification, where a woman's body is used to sell a product. This practice is still common in advertising, despite sparking backlash. It's like using a picture of a delicious cake to sell a car – it's not relevant to the product, and it's not respectful to the woman in the picture.
Analysis
The Attention Economy
Today, attention is currency, whether it converts into sales or contributes to any meaningful narrative. Social media platforms like Douyin, TikTok, and Instagram reward content that stops the scroll. The industry's assumption is that a woman's body does that – and much faster than a list of product features.
Beyond the Campaign – Into Everyday Life
Dr Michelle Ho, assistant professor of feminist and queer cultural studies at the National University of Singapore's Department of Communications and New Media, notes that the objectification of women in advertising is not limited to campaigns. It is a reflection of the broader societal attitudes towards women's bodies. 'The way we talk about women's bodies is a reflection of how we think about them,' she says. 'We need to do better in terms of how we represent women in advertising and in society as a whole.'
The Industry's Response
Advertising veterans Daniel Ko and Loo Yong Ping agree that there is no evidence to support the effectiveness of using sexually objectifying ads. Ko attributes the industry's fixation with performance metrics, in which clicks, views, and reactions get mistaken for effectiveness. 'They don't always convert (into product sales),' he says. Loo notes that healthy public discourse around a campaign can sometimes be considered a success, but ultimately, clients sign off on campaigns. He emphasizes that his team's internal culture provides a safeguard against using sex to sell, and that alternative concepts can still achieve marketing objectives.
Key points
- Sexually objectifying ads continue to be used by brands to sell products.
- There is no evidence to support the effectiveness of this approach.
- The objectification of women in advertising is a reflection of broader societal attitudes towards women's bodies.
- Brands are starting to move away from objectifying women, towards more inclusive and respectful advertising.
If brands continue to move away from objectifying women, we may see a shift towards more inclusive and respectful advertising. This could lead to a more positive representation of women in society, and a reduction in the objectification of women's bodies.
If brands continue to prioritize short-term gains over long-term brand building, we may see a continued reliance on objectifying women in advertising. This could lead to further backlash and a negative impact on women's representation and agency.